一直在默默的觀察 Stellarium 的開發，不過都沒有在這裡提起，簡單說一下囉：
老實說我還滿想功成身退的 XD。這就是惰性呀(遠目)。
– 妳在做什麼？
– 我在原地反時鐘旋轉。
– 每轉一圈，搶走地球旋轉的角動量。
– 讓它的自轉慢一點。
– 拉長夜晚，使白天晚點到來。
– 讓我有多那一點點時間待在這裡 …
– … 和你在一起。
我超愛這張圖片。
可是腦中的物理告訴我當她停止旋轉的時候，因為角動量守恆，地球的轉速會立刻回復。
這想法算是我個人的左右腦衝突吧。
How to dissect a paper by Ellen Gottlieb, 2003. Given to me from a teacher and it does help. A lot. Hope it helps you too.
Overview:
- Look at the title and authors.
- Read the abstract.
- Look at the figures to access quality (If they don’t look good, keep this in mind when assessing the paper)
- Read the last paragraph of the introduction which will give you the objective, the rationale and the approach
- Read the first paragraph of the discussion which will give you the objective, approach and major conclusion(s)
- Read the last paragraph of the discussion which will give you the implications and possibly future directions.
- Now read the paper through from being to end and critically analyze the paper.
- You might also want to look through the reference titles for additional info or other papers that might interest you.
When dissecting a paper, Ask yourself:
- What is the overall objective of this paper?
- What is the approach?
- What is the point of each figure or group of figures?
- What do the data actually prove? (Note: Figures which do not address objectives of the paper may be extraneous and could be eliminated or just mentioned in passing in a short presentation)
- Are the conclusions in the paper supported by the actual data or are alternate conclusions appropriate?
- What might you do next given their data?
Remember:
- Just because a paper is published, doesn’t mean it is correct
- A paper may have excellent data but incorrect (or skewed) conclusions. Base your future experiments on what the data show and not necessarily on the authors’ conclusions. This is often a good place to start on a new exciting experiments. Another good place for ideas on future experiments is the last paragraph of the paper.