– 妳在做什麼?
– 我在原地反時鐘旋轉。
– 每轉一圈,搶走地球旋轉的角動量。
– 讓它的自轉慢一點。
– 拉長夜晚,使白天晚點到來。
– 讓我有多那一點點時間待在這裡 …
– … 和你在一起。
我超愛這張圖片。
可是腦中的物理告訴我當她停止旋轉的時候,因為角動量守恆,地球的轉速會立刻回復。
這想法算是我個人的左右腦衝突吧。
While everyone is excited about the new iPhone 3G, or depressed because of the fact that it won’t be available in Taiwan for a year or so, what WWDC keynote really caught my attention was, instead, the new web service that would eventually replace .Mac – Apple MobileMe platform.
It’s funny to see how the software giants response the “access my personal (mail|calendar|todo…) anywhere” question. Microsoft’s answer to that is an Exchange Server with it’s special client, i.e. Outlook, on desktops and mobiles. It’s a very classical software company approach, which evolves building everything for every purpose. Google, instead, as a company providing web service, build their services on websites – wherever there is a device, there is a browser, services on browsers are indeed, accessible anywhere.
Apple’s approach is MobileMe. MobileMe works with native applications, from Outlook to Mail.app to iPhones – so it works like an Exchange Server. What’s more, MobileMe can be access via browsers anywhere – so it also works like Google Apps. Apple is bring the two worlds together under one platform – if you are willing to pay and get vendor lock-in-ed, it would “just work”, as Jobs puts it.
Of course, the two worlds is already merging, with or without Apple. Google Android will be available later this year, and Microsoft Exchange Servers are featuring web access a long time ago (with their dumb ActiveX object though). But no one had ever get this right from the start with completed features.
MobileMe is not officially started yet; no one knows whether it will really do what it claims. I am glad that all the companies are thinking like a web right now. It’s web! It’s about clients and servers, and accessability! We are at the turning point or history – in a decade or so, when we look back, we will never recognize how we handle our information today.
以台灣大眾拼陣的個性,不知這樣會激出什麼樣的火花。
今天早上翻報紙看到昨天的四川賑災募款晚會,寫了很多哪位名人/企業捐了多少,誰當接線生多麼認真等等的新聞。不討論那些慈善機構為什麼這麼喜歡 photo-op、該捐緬甸還是捐四川或是捐款利用效率等等的問題啦,有個台灣好像沒有人玩過的「配對捐款」應該可以試試看?
配對捐款(Matching donations)指的是若大家經由某個管道捐錢,累計起來多少錢(例如台幣一千萬),那答應配對捐款的組織就會再捐同等金額出去(所以最後受贈者可以收到兩千萬)。像地震這種大家都在募款,捐款管道一堆的時候,這種活動可以有效吸金;因為捐你這邊明顯比其他地方效益來的多。我不知道昨天的晚會大眾捐款總額跟企業體比誰少誰多;如果有企業願意試試看這樣的活動方式,說不定效果會很好?